Features from 2006 Independents Biennial Liverpool
In Another Place PDF Print E-mail

In Another Place Submissions

In Another Place

As Antony Gormley’s iron men sculptures near the end of their long stay on Crosby Beach more and more people are photographing each other with the life-size statues. Some confront the sculptures; others treat it as a member of the family. The sculptures have been dressed up, occasionally – some poseurs have almost matched their nudity!

The Independents created a web exhibition of a photograph throughout the Biennial period.

 

 



"Great Shag" by Ms. Bob Blackwell


"UT" by Delia Brady-Jacobs.


"Look here, look there" by Joonas Sirvio.


"Now that's what I call a man" by anon.


"The Sandman goes to work" by Wendy McGregor.


"I saw Nothing" by Benjamin Fenton.


"UT" by Steve McKay.


"UT" by Alan Thomas.


"Man" by David J Colbran.


"Isis Walking" by Joann Kushner.


"UT" by Colin McPherson.


"Base Chakra" by G.


"UT" by Chris Kerfoot.


"Kick Boxer" by Deb James.


"UT" by David J. Colbran


"UT" by Stephen McKay.


"UT" by Laurence Payot.


"UT" by Alan Thomas.


"Seaweed Man" by Deb James.


"Ever Ready" by Steve McKay.

 
On Nadim Karam PDF Print E-mail

Only Dream Bombs, Wandering, and the Watercolour War Corres(des)pondent.

On Nadim Karam by Alex Hetherington


Sometimes the best way to get to the truth of war is to switch off your `television, stop listening to the radio, dispense with your online connection, drop the RRS feeds and stay away from the abundance of LIVE coverage with six reports simultaneously commentating on an ever unfolding scenario of bombings, brutalized civilians, borders rewritten, missiles not hitting targets, car explosions and picture galleries of dead soldiers and plane crashes, old men and women in dirty pyjamas being carried by dust and rubble infested family members, politicians in hotel suites guiding us through their armoury of ideologies and our democracy rules ok recitals, their at once-removed blissfully unawareness of the agonized, played with a soundtrack with some aplomb on the piano, Condoleeza Rice. In short get away from the technology and the screen and the monitors and the fast flipping between CCN, ITN and the BBC. And just pick up some paper and a palette of watercolour paints and start painting.

 




Perhaps the worst atrocity in all of up-to-the-minute technology, 24 hour blanket coverage, hot off the press reportage is it’s getting boring; it’s the same story, same shit in Groundhog Day loops. We need another depiction. Otherwise it’s just another spectacle, another sensational Breaking News story that’s not going from TV to brain, from pixel to penetration, from airwaves to apprehending.

Nadim Karam, Beirut-based artist, architect and world traveller has a simple response to the seemingly simple and easy and fast decision to wage a thirty-day war in the Lebanon, filled with agony and atrocity, pain and displacement, in response to the capture of two Israeli soldiers. He paints pictures. It’s this tension of response and retaliation, of question and answer, of big gun, bigger impact, huge explosion, tiny ripple that makes his recent art in reaction to the Middle-East crisis seem so compelling. They are at once beautifully engaging, naively rendered, utterly alluring and describe the worst. Just the worst.





These works were drawn in a way in flight; in pursuit of a real reaction, in need to flee for safety (despite the experience of kidnaps and being shot at, Karam wanted to stay, but he has a wife and children and he didn’t want them to experience too much, too
soon), in the need to just state (however much in flux that state maybe) and not intellectualize. They are in memory. In memorial. They are also incredibly generous.

Karam works in this medium often, but is equally often not willing to place them in public. They have an intimacy that exhibits a personal panacea and a public thrall. They have muscle-flexing surfers on wide-winged aircraft catching waves on a festoon of human bodies; dizzy dream bombs falling onto giraffes; big bulbous colourful blimp clouds in clear, hot skies, the exasperated puff breaths of huge explosions; angular people graphics falling out of tower blocks in regimental formation; brown earth cut outs for sheltering under an elephant and a skipping couple; the same couple setting their shadow across a meadow of rupture and chaos. They flicker between hope and its opposite, frustration and wanting to forget, agony and the delicate, the naïve and the kind of genuineness that only comes with experience.




I read recently in an article in the Guardian that there is no war art anymore, or what counts for war art now is only the last vestige of a long tradition in Western art to depict hell where no other medium could be made available. Karam isn’t a Western artist; his
work blends and melds references from a wider source of visual vocabularies. He’s taken his line for a walk through art history, like a mad adventurer, a mad explorer, reinvesting pieces of Miro, Picasso, Francesco Clemente, Keith Haring, Jonathan Borofsky, and an array of other Western artists with a Middle-Eastern sensibility. A sensibility based on a metaphor for Beirut; constant change, new identities, rebuilding, reconstructing, living with weaponary, tearing down, new vistas, new outlooks, sitting on ruins, tearing down symbols so that the extremism might not get a chance to harbour.

I think that’s what Karam is seeking; a way to use these urban shifts, changes, flexibilities, threateningly temporary states, movement, emerging political narratives to tell stories, to tell stories about extremes, about what extremes mean, what terror means and what the inverse of these might look and sound like, how they might take on form. Karam is also an architect. He’s aware of the vocabulary of urban shaping; maybe it’s the utopian shaping that underlies his motivations. It also seems important to him to use creativity as a counter-offensive to the machines and economies of conflict. He’s trying to present a new project in Kabul for instance, that might tell an entirely different story to the one emerging on the one-pixel thick interpretation of current events. It seems in Karam’s arsenal creativity is something to set off dream bombs not real bombs.

Karam is shortly to return to Beirut after a six-week stay in Europe. Stay. I make it sound like a holiday; it’s more like a forced exile. But he seems calm, he’s looking forward to going back, he’s returning to London soon to launch his publication URBAN TOYS, a companion to his previous publication VOYAGE. These titles speak a great deal of his outlook on crisis, on cities, on life, on drawing, on creativity. On being a citizen in the world. We discussed not knowing ‘what its really like’, his travelling, global warming, flexibility in the face of the anti-progressive, the possibilities, amputating terror, the construction of revolt, expression as a force, balance, dreams, Blair and Bush,
how we compensate for terror, observation, cultures, his mighty schedule, his reinvention of a sense of home, and what home means when it looks different every day, his past and future projects. That all of this, his experiences, his depictions, creative ideas floating and interchanging, is to him a “learning process” and that in that process is the vehicle for change.

Karam was keen to explain that he’s not criticizing the Blair and Bush regimes, their actions and obvious lack of apprehending, of their extremes, on their catalogue of the repugnant and repulsive, on their reactions to the repugnant and repulsive. He seems to be suggesting that simple responses, simple creative responses are what’s required now.

That seems to be the most radical answer yet.


Nadam Karam's watercolours "The Beirut Series and its Effect on Global Warming"can be seen Upstairs at Editions, 16 Cook Street, Liverpool. From 16th September to 21st October 2006.

Nadim Karam's "Sketch Journal" can be seen at
museumMAN, Parliament Street. From 16th September to 24th November 2006.
 

 
On Adam Nankervis PDF Print E-mail

Curating the curious On nomadic, necessary, impermanent, collective, obsessive and spontaneous strategies
The sociable art of Adam Nankervis

by Alex Hetherington


Australian-born, Liverpool-based artist Adam Nankervis works with a collision of tactics, an array of tensions and assemblage, a merger of disputations, negotiations and dialogues and a broad wealth of visual art vocabulary that connects his practice within the territories of artists like Maurizio Cattelan, Kurt Schwitters, Marcel Broodthaers, Kyoichi Tsuzuki, Gregor Schneider, curators like Massimiliano Gioni and Ali Subotnick and the strategy of the artist-led project/ curator/ gallery/ space/ publisher. And similar to Schwitters’ grotto Merzbau, Nankervis’ home is the site for his art: private home, public space, public life, private life, self as institution, life’s work and man as museum.

 


Rooted in a long-standing history of the museum, collecting, the impulse to travel and obtain, Nankervis is a kind of Pitt Rivers Museum on contemporary topographies. It’s a simultaneous mix of “paleontology, natural history, archeology, ethnography, optics, cosmology, art”, complimented with a notion of abstracting objects, art, happenings, exhibitions, screenings, performances and materials that essentially reinvigorate their original intentions with new, assembled, contrived meanings. His home is at once artists residency centre, gallery, venue, and arena for exchanges, presentations and dialogues. It is a showcase for the incongruent, museum, vehicle for a tension between anonymity and recognition and a place to live. With no minimalism here, thanks; the photographic documentation presented on his web site bombards the viewer with a sense of plenty. As he says it’s never vacant unless it’s selected to be so.



Nankervis describes his activities as born “out of necessity”. Museum Man he describes as “an open cabinet of curiosities spelling a history of two cities with an eclectic mix of art and artifact, which has now manifested and transposed its dialogue of a lived in museum from Berlin to Liverpool.” It is also a mirror to the institution that corresponds a deliberate attempt to question the institution, the collected and the commodity and a pathway between art circuits and art circuses. This is the spectacle of the museum itself on display, the mechanics of its making rendered transparent. He describes it as a mechanism that deconstructs and demystifies the routes in art, and channels resources that result in “entry, accessibility, and validation”. The turnaround is remarkable, with the space/home occupying shows, DJs, performances, screenings, events on a totally super-active, super-agitated, super-curious level. How this happens is organic, by word of mouth, by invitation, by being social, democratic and non-judgmental and by retaining a philosophy and vision that is open, encircled by anticipation and accepting of what may occur. The artists and their work, and what they gift, leave behind or install within this scenario is its central modus operandi, and it’s in this collision of potential chaos, unending streams of energy and input, cultures and geographies, people, audiences, artists and party-goers that Nankervis lives. It’s what he describes, with total genuineness, as a “privilege”. And it’s what makes this activity hold such value: the familiarity and informality of home, questioning the rarefied and remote, engaging the display and its audience, the signs of art alternative guerrilla strategist and sybaritic bon vivant emerge as a unified seductive policy. It’s enthralling to hear about installations and performances in the kitchen and bathroom or art agendas and philosophies being scrutinized in hallway and cupboard, of opening up the basement for discotheques and discourses.



Nankervis further illuminates this policy with answers about how this comes about and how it can be approached: the disparate in assemblage, the mutating mass of information, the spill of activity and conjoining and commingling, the non-defining and ambiguous tally for the attention of audiences and participants to emerge with their own conclusions and choices, of their own selection, of being their own curators in deciding what to engage with and what to, not reject, but wait off until later. It’s not a factory either; Nankervis doesn’t make a living from this, it’s not rooted in celebrity or in showmanship, or as a vehicle from destabilizing the institution to becoming central to it, to be tempted and allured by it.



From it’s origins as Another Vacant Space in New York in the early 1990s, where commodity, economic failure and recession and opportunity merged, transforming as a form and function in Berlin (with a stopover in Copenhagen) through transformation to its destination now as residency in Liverpool, for Independents Nankervis, the Museum Man, presents his Blur Prints. Another Vacant Space which represents not a culmination of activity but a slice of it away from his home/space/museum to reinvest and restage its vibrancy in an open arena where it can be shared and experienced.

Maurizio Cattelan’s Wrong Gallery project, also in New York, once presented an artwork by the British artist Adam McEwen. It said: “"Fuck Off We're Closed". I could never imagine Nankervis displaying this sentiment, though he might present the artwork. Rather it would seem his sign would say: “We’re having a cherry-bomb pink floor. Let’s Party!”

museumMan
25 Parliament Street, Liverpool

museumman.org 

 
On Gino Saccone PDF Print E-mail

Asylum’s Turnstile / The Protective Procession

by Alex Hetherington


An asylum seeker can be thought of as status sought by a person physically present within a country, having fled their own on grounds that are detrimental to their person, liberties or well being. Further, the individual must have a well-founded fear of persecution on the basis of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion, if made to return to his or her country of nationality. If the person does not have a country of nationality, then they must fear these grounds upon returning to their last place of habitual residence. One of these five grounds of asylum must be proven in order for the individual to win an asylum claim. Asylees differ from refugees in that the asylee has already entered the country when they are trying to obtain status.

 


This is paraphrased from American and British immigration web sites. It’s broadly speaking the administrative description, matter-of-fact, general information, fast tracking, deporting, human farming overview of what an asylum seeker is. It does not describe who an asylum seeker is.

If we chose to describe an asylum seeker from British, European or Northern American press quotes, we might receive a different kind of description, which is usually bound up with terms - depending on the level of journalism – like: mistrust, alien cultures, difference, them and us, outsider, economic migrant, freeloader, ignorant peasant, job thief, extremist, victim, pretender, coward, freeloader, the dreadful unknown, black, enemy. Refugee meanwhile is bound together with terms like natural disaster, innocent victim, war-torn, escape, sanctuary and Red Cross, United Nations peacekeepers, Bob Geldof and Bono, the BBC’s Michael Buerk. The language and terminology, the premise and definition differ depending on a judgment call of when you think someone in need is the mastermind of their own demise. Or not. And what it is you think they want.



Another definition of asylum seeker is; communicative, open, resourceful, courageous, interacting, social, inclusive, participant. Or another: “I’ve witnessed the edge of sanity and barbarity, can you help me because I don’t want to die.”

This concept of frictions and tensions between detachment and language, awareness and definition, the general, the homogenized and the personal, the social and the intimate is an element at play in the recent work of the London-based performance artist Gino Saccone. Saccone in his devised, community-led performance work, which in the past has also explored relationships of remembrance and interventions between outsider and insider, has a simple goal to reveal the processes of awareness and the production of awareness. In his piece Turnstile, he does this by taking the celebratory aspects of the parade, merged with the immediacy, vigor and enmity of the protest and collapses them together to form a public procession that invites interaction, dialogue, human contact and engaged experience that at once reveals the nature of misgivings and apprehensions, definitions and stereotypes and replaces them with opportunity and communication.

The parade and the protest are signifiers in our society which express notions of free speech, celebration, dissent, ritual, memorial, occasion. With mirrored banners and placards Saccone’s Turnstile will be a procession of the protective and personal and will feature a group of asylum seekers taking to the streets of Liverpool reflecting back their immediate surroundings, reflecting back their immediate condition and inviting a truth to be manifest, shared and enjoyed. Saccone describes an inventory of injustice, human fears and terrible experiences tempered with a desire for an encounter of assumption, meeting, contact and revelation.

The parade in recent art has taken on different forms; from Matthew Barney’s numerous ostentatious pageants in his work and films, catwalks of the weird, glamorous and superhuman, of ceremonies to fetish, desire and beauty to Francis Alÿs’ projects like Seven Walks that assemble notions of authority, trespass and the transient, or Santiago Sierra’s interventions that reveal, through exploitation, the duality of economic advancements and personal poverty. Saccone, though, presents something that is rooted in a social conscious processed through communication and workshops that feature real people with real experiences that are not bound by either commerciality or art star vanity.

At the same time, the location of this work, Liverpool reinforces its sense of the international destination and origination, of immigration and emigration, of departures and arrivals, of human trafficking, of slavery, of the colonial, of Empire’s built. And at this time where asylum seeker remains such a point of contention Saccone’s performance will remind us of a lineage of barbarity, of a history of exploitation that is both familiar and unfamiliar. Nevertheless, the basis of this work is human contact, something that the parade as a social form has been designed to stimulate.

Friday 15 Septemeber 2006
Gino Sarconne's "Turnstile
"

Liverpool Procession
2.45pm Wood Street (Start)
4.00pm St George's Hall
5.00pm Albert Dock
6.00pm Greenland Street

 
Ben Parry and Jacques Chauchat PDF Print E-mail

Ballet Mechanique - Ben Parry and Jacques Chauchat.

by Leo Wood

Huge changes to the physical and social fabric of the city of Liverpool are taking place. In reaction to these changes, Jump Ship Rat (JSR), a local art collective, have chosen to explore Liverpool 08’s prevailing cultural theme ‘City in Transition’, and to make an artistic interpretation of Liverpool’s changing urban fabric.

JSR, who have been themselves pushed out of their home by new building developments and as a result do not have a building space to work from, have looked at ways of addressing these changes; finding ways of taking art beyond the city’s interior spaces and onto the streets, extending the notion of temporary public art. Ben Parry, one of the original founders of JSR, says that, ‘to match the city’s development we need to re-invent the way in which artwork is encountered and experienced’.

Parry has engaged and explored the changing nature of the physical and psychological urban fabric throughout much of his work, seeking to discover, ‘new and unknown territories where art becomes engaged with the social and political realities of everyday life’. But Ben Parry has mixed feelings towards the rapid development of Liverpool, as he says that having no venue to work from has created new challenges for him as an artist and has been liberating in a way; Ballet Mechanique has been born as a result of this.


Collaborators Ben Parry from Liverpool and Jacques Chauchat from Paris, have decided to take their historical practice of working with reclaimed material and kinetic sculpture, out of the gallery and into the street with their sonic junk street machine. A fully charged 1975 milk float picked up from a Dairy Express ‘milk float graveyard’ has undergone a metamorphosis to become an ‘electro-mechanic orchestra’. The float has been built up to a height of 5 meters with an integrated series of mechanical sculptures made from the detritus of the city; discarded objects collected from Mersey Waste’s domestic disposal sites - ‘45 cubic meters of kling, clunk, slash and boom’.

In its alteration, the milk float has become a kinetic cacophony of interlocking motors, pulleys, wheels, cogs and other mechanisms, creating a sound to reverberate through the city. Parry calls this, ‘the animation of objects in anarchic motion in which the spectator experiences the poetic language and song of detritus’, resounding the pace, dynamism, movement and infinite chaos of Liverpool. In recycling the actual waste from the city, the milk float also transforms itself into a conceptual vehicle for urban ecology, reflecting the city as a living organism in a constant state of change and modification.


Following the transformation of the milk float at the hands of Ben and Jacques, its original function can also still be seen as an integrated unit within the new dynamic and complex art machine; the original milk float being itself a part of the ecological system of a city, enabling the process of food production and supply, mapping the urban terrain and exemplifying the concept of the sustainable community inherent in the milk round.

In all these ways, the milk float reflects and represents the past, present and possibly future of the changing city of Liverpool. Yet the irony to this is that as a machine, the milk float is also functionless, a sculpture of the absurd, ‘debris in perfect disorder’. In operation from 14th September, Ballet Mechanique will make its journey throughout the city each day throughout the Independents, offering all those that it meets a surprise encounter and the discovery of the unknown. Ben Parry suggests that this aspect of the piece is important to him; ‘I like the idea of cultural hijack and to stopping people in their tracks’. In this way, Parry’s reference to Dadaism become apparent, a rejection of traditional artistic and cultural values. He regards The Milk Float as an interventionist piece that takes people by surprise, against their active choice to experience art within the safety of an art gallery. This is not a sanctioned artwork. The milk float has a fixed route, reflective of the milk round of old, and Ben likes the idea of building up an audience throughout the duration of the Independents, ’to have people in offices looking out their windows at a certain time each day’. But the journey of the float will also always have an element of flexibility and openness to change. The milk float will create spontaneous and memorable moments in an otherwise routine day. As well as being an artistically innovative and challenging piece, it is also simple anarchic fun. So keep all eyes peeled not to miss it, though this seems impossible, when Ballet Mechanique hits your street, heads are sure to turn.

Ballet Mechanique is on tour in the city throughout the festival
 
 
On Nina Edge PDF Print E-mail

Real Life, the Private and the Public : On Nina Edge

by Alex Hetherington


Liverpool-based artist Nina Edge’s life is her work, in a way that could in principal be related to the ongoing, mammoth Real Life projects of Glasgow-based artist Ross Sinclair. Like him she works with modern motifs, symbols of the institutions that define our lives and institutional contexts, the individual in relation to those institutions and ideas that flicker between the public domain and the private existence, between policy-making, think-tanks of progressive actions, sweeping changes to social dynamics and their effect on life and society. Her array of output in material and conceptual terms is equally broad, from performance to objects, installations to interventions, activated and activist responses and fabric-based pieces and texts. All rooted in a contextual, conceptual response to issues, political circumstances and community-sited actions and activities. These issues and ideas, though, are directly sourced from her own situation not abstracted from objective observations, but from something lived through, experienced and challenged on a day-to-day basis.

I conducted a lengthy conversation with Nina over the phone in preparation for her new piece to be shown during Independents. During the conversation we discussed a number of weighty issues, a number of political changes we have both witnessed since Thatcher and the changes she has made to her approach to being an artist and making art. We spoke also about the terror waged by Britain against itself, of Bush and Blair as masters and defenders of the shareholder, the paranoia devised by the media and our politicians, and the journey that we have gone in recent times from optimism to dismay.


She started off by describing the installation and production of her new work for Independents. The piece is a specially-made net curtain to be installed in the front room window of her terraced home; the net curtain she explains is a form that at once conceals and reveals, decorates, adorns and disguises, it speaks of a very British phenomenon related to home, class and period. The net curtain I remember was used during an installation at Tramway by Pipilotti Rist called Show a Leg in the early part of this decade. Rist’s video projections light was caught on and spilled through screen upon screen of net curtains beautifying the vast space of Tramway’s main gallery. All frilly forms, whirling stitching, floral patterns and curving fringes filling Tramway with images of outside and inside, vibrant video colours and human bodies in motion and fall. It was a beautiful experience. But Nina Edge’s net curtain is a more rebellious, disobedient piece of work additionally rooted in protest, and polemic and political slogans; it is an invitation to peek and vocalize at the same time. It has been made as a direct response to the disintegration of public and private, of governmental scrutinizing on personal affairs, on policies that effectively make communities disappear, of the enrichment of the wealthy and rendering the dissident as extremist, the market-force and profit as paramount and an action to demolish a way of life and homes literally to enhance the portfolios of property developers and replace public and social liberties and responsibilities with private ideologies, agendas and values. The net curtain has been made, as Edge describes: “is the only way she knows how to” in response to misguided social engineering though she is becoming more and more conversant with legal speak,
administrative jargon and political policy loops. She divides her time with art production and leading an action group in protest at the wilful destruction of her way of life and the lives of others in her community.



So instead of the usual net curtain, familiar, kitschy, floral and feminine we will see a beautifully made political graphic sown on a machine that is heading for obsolescence, removal, disappearance itself. Edge is not critiquing progress or change; she is though critiquing changes that defy, devalue and fragment what we come to term as “our way of life”: our free speech, our liberties or our ability to debate and protest. Changes that are replacing core values with profits, social needs with spreadsheets and existence with economics.

Nina Edge lives in a community that is being threatened by physical and social annihilation in order for a programme of new house building to occur that will place housing stock in the hands of private concerns. It is a policy of the short-term and abstracted; it pulls resources away from where they are needed and sets up competition where the public and private are merged, mainly to the detriment of the public and the growth of the private. Edge asks a fundamental question: what is the private and what is the public? She is an artist who works at a grassroots local level because it’s happening to her; the threats to her way of life are happening to her and by extension to us all. This work is made from a need to articulate, communicate and inform. It is immediate, tender, desperate, engaging, inviting, social, elaborate, reactive and active. It is finely conceived, in the tiniest of details, inviting inspection and broadly formed, demanding action.
Real Life. Indeed.

"Nothing is Private" by Nina Edge can be seen at home - 40 Kelvin Grove

 
Curator David Hancock PDF Print E-mail

I’ll Be Your Mirror - Curator David Hancock

by Leo Wood

Since the birth of representational art, people have been painting portraits as a way to represent and understand humanity. And yet as artist David Hancock sees it, our understanding of portraiture is both limited and stifling. Hancock has chosen to explore and challenge the idea of portraiture, claiming that it can be, ‘so much more than a painting of a little kiddie in the living room’. I’ll Be your Mirror, an exhibition curated by David Hancock that features the work of eleven artists, invigorates the idea of portraiture for the 21st Century.

Hancock entered the BP Portrait Award a few years back and was disappointed by the stereotyped way in which the sitters were often depicted. When looking at a portrait he would often feel a sense of detachment from the person on the canvas and as if it was actually expressing more about the artist, ‘The works felt false, as if they didn’t get to the heart of the sitter’.

Portraiture has mostly made as its subject the great and the good, but to avoid this stigma, the artists of I’ll Be Your Mirror look towards a wider group of people, objects and animals in their paintings, to capture a sense of our globalised society at the beginning of this century, taking many different approaches to the concept of the portrait. I’ll Be Your Mirror includes the work of some artists who do not normally or exclusively make portraits, but work has been commissioned especially for this exhibition, by artists including Leo Fitzmaurice and Rui Matsunaga. Hancock’s own painting featuring in the exhibition, ‘I Wear Black on the Outside’, is also a slight departure for him, in terms of his body of work thus far. This painting, his most recent to date, marks the start of a series of works that will focus more specifically on portraits and people, up close and personal, rather than depicting figures
within a broader landscape.



‘I Wear Black on the Outside’ is a painting with echoes of the Annunciation, and is based on a real-life story, sent in a letter to Hancock, about a girl who saved her friend from committing suicide in his bedroom when she came across him wielding a knife. The figures in the portrait are not highly posed; the eye of the artist is that of a hidden observer in the bedroom. Life is breathed into the portrait, also thanks to Hancock’s photorealist technique and skill as a painter.

Ill Be Your Mirror is co-curated by Richard Meaghan, whose work also features here and who helped Hancock curate his last collaborative exhibition, Jerusalem. In this previous showcase, the artists took William Blake’s poem of the same name as a starting point from which to explore the idea and sense of the landscape as it was understood by the Romantics, in all its wild power, with the aim being to create, ‘new worlds with a sense of the poetic’.



Hancock and Meaghan also co-curated an exhibition at the Liverpool Biennale ’04, Le Petit Paysage, translated as The Small Landscape, and exactly that; an exhibit of small landscape paintings by over 25 artists; both an interesting concept and a practical solution to the
difficulties of transporting many artist’s work all across the country for the event.

Other artists featuring their work at I’ll Be Your Mirror include Jemima and Dolly Brown, an artist whom Hancock had admired for several years since seeing her work at New Contemporaries in 1997. Jemima’s pieces are based around the persona of Dolly Brown, an alter ego who started life as a blow-up doll and since has developed and is depicted in many different guises in Jemima’s work. In this exhibition, she turns on its head the long English tradition of 'domestic' portraiture in a series of sculpted and sort-of dismembered Dolly heads in flowery wreathes, all with a hint of 1970’s interior design.



Another artist exhibiting here is Gordon Cheung, who has worked already on several projects with David Hancock. Whilst Hancock was reluctant to include artists who had already exhibited at Jerusalem, Hancock realised that Cheung, though he was more well known for his dystopian landscape visions, was onto something interesting in his portraits of the 'Top 10 Dead Celebrity Earners'; personifying a ‘dead rich list’ of people who could almost be the gods of the dystopian world that Cheung had created in his landscape paintings.

On a different note, Isabel Young make portraits of animals in her work, and in doing so, elevates the status of the animal at the same time as challenging our understanding of what should and should not be an artist’s subject in portraiture. Isabel remembers famous
animals in history, such as ‘Nero’, King James’ lion, and her miniature-style paintings are certainly an interesting alternative to taxidermy.

I’ll Be Your Mirror is exhibited in a corridor space, on the 6th floor of the Gostin Buildings, Hanover Street, nicely placed between the Tate and the Adelphi. Slightly haphazard maybe, but is in the very nature of Independents to investigate the use of alternative ways to exhibit as all precious gallery space is used up at the Biennial. In an alternative exhibition space, with alternative approaches to the portrait; this should be an exciting event.

'I'll Be Your Mirror'
6th Floor Gostin's Building
16th Sep - 26th Nov
 
Cape Farewell- Art and Climate Change PDF Print E-mail

Cape Farewell : Art and Climate Change

by Peter Hagerty


Does citizenship demand responsibility? Historically social responsibility has revolved around the local polis in the maintenance of control and order, but today the sphere of concern is global and while the creationists, the multinationals and the oil companies in particular conspire to undermine and evade their responsibility, the inconvenient truth found at the earth's poles is now incontrovertible.

Simply stated the relationship between the levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide and global temperature are directly related and the evidence from planetary scientists is clear, the earth's oceans are undergoing a period of warming not seen since the beginning of the
Holocene; the relatively warm period we live in that has existed since the end of the last major ice age 12,000 years ago. Furthermore the dramatic recent rise in carbon dioxide levels parallel the period of human activity since the industrial revolution, an inconvenient
truth indeed for those who only see "growth" as the route to a happy society. The likely outcome of this business as usual "growth" economy is a predicted three degree rise in temperature; not much you might think but the consequences for the likes of the people of
Bangladesh and other low lying areas (e.g. Cambridge, England) will be devastating.

The artist, curator and expedition organiser David Buckland considered the role that art may have in raising public awareness of climate change "How do you approach climate change through art and the artistic process?" he asks "you can't make art directly about carbon dioxide levels, the challenge instead is to look for an emotional response, rather than an informative approach". It was from these thoughts that The Cape Farewell Project was born and in 2003 Buckland invited a group of artists and scientists aboard the schooner Noorderlicht in a voyage to the western coast of the Arctic, his invitation required no commitment, other than to crew the boat and was simply an offer to "come and see this and maybe it will affect your future work". Some artists responded on their arrival to the spectacular Arctic environment, the sculptor Antony Gormley and the architect Peter Clegg carved huge blocks of ice, the sound artist Max Easterly hydrophone in hand explored the depths of the Arctic ocean, while others like the writer Ian Mc Ewan returned home to ruminate and reflect on how he could incorporate his experience in any future novel. The sculptor Rachel Whiteread subsequently filled the Turbine Hall of Tate Modern with hundreds of white cubes for her piece "Embankment" (2005) which she describes as her "cast of a glacial plain".

 


Subsequently there were two further research expeditions to the High Arctic and currently works by a number of artists who have been part of the Cape Farewell project can be seen in Liverpool and these fruits of Buckland's initiative give ample testimony to his wish that the artist's approach should be an emotional response rather than a didactic exposition on the science of climate change. The work of Heather Ackroyd and David Harvey in the Liverpool Conservation Centre is an example of artists reflecting on their Cape Farewell experience in their use of a Minkie Whale which had been washed up on the English coast near Skegness as their material. The mammal's corpse is the source for their beautiful and monumental momenti mori "Stranded" (2005-06) in which they finally dress the dead white whale bones with encrustations of alum crystals resembling ice; we can not fail to be moved by the beauty we negligently destroy.

At the Walker Art Gallery three matt boxed digital films by Nick Edwards explore the unique land and seascapes of these northern regions, in his piece "80deg 05'N : 16deg 44'E" (2006) Edwards records the fantastic contrast between ice and sea, and in a second work "Ultima Thule" (2006) clouds slowly drift across the fantastic polar landscape in a rarely seen long take of time based landscape photography. Also at the Walker, Gary Hume's "Hermaphrodite Polar Bear" (2003), rendered with his trademark enamel paint on aluminium provocatively shocks us into seeing how we selfishly wreak havoc on the environment and it's wild life, in this instance horribly mutating the sexuality of these creatures so loved by children.

 


Buckland, a photographer by origin, explores in an installation at JMU's 68 Hope Street gallery the use of fragmented collodion negatives, the photographic film of the earliest polar explorers, in an evocation of an Arctic ice flow. Elsewhere Buckland uses colour photographs to record text authored by the Canadian author Gretel Ehrlich, an early sailor and contributor to Cape Farewell, whose words Buckland subsequently video projected onto ice flows, their titles include "Burning Ice" and " Sadness Melts" words which hover between the literal and the metaphysical; the frustration of the hopeless in the face of pending catastrophe.

How then do other artists respond to this pressing concern? On the evidence of this years global International Biennials it is simply business as usual, the artists jetting around the planet with the other uber professionals and tourists. Of course many contemporary artists, like society at large, invest in recycled materials but few directly address the most pressing question of our times. I remarked upon this absence of work dealing with climate change to a secondary school teacher who replied that among her young students "it is the most common theme in their work".

Why then is there such a gap in thinking between the generations? Age is supposed to bring wisdom but perhaps we could start the baby boomers education with a carbon inventory for every artist's exhibition, and given the apparent poor level of literacy among this
generation we could adopt a colour coding as used by the supermarkets in labelling their hazardous but edible food. Green for "Minimal Damage", Amber for "I'm trying" and Red for "Eco terrorist".

'Cape Farewell : Art and Climate Change'
At various locations in Liverpool
Walker Art Gallery, William Brown St.
The Conservation Centre, Whitechapel
Liverpool JMU 68 Hope St
Albert Dock
Liverpool Anglican Cathedral

16th Sep - 26th Nov
 
On Gregory Scott-Gurner PDF Print E-mail

The Art Organisation (TAO) : On Gregory Scott-Gurner

by Cecilia Andersson

In conversation with Sarat Maharaj, the Chilean artist Mario Navarro spoke about his work in response to the quick pace of the contemporary art world. His most recent work, which is the result of having worked collaboratively with a group of people who have had brain injuries, is currently on display at the Central Library and embraces a multiplicity of ideas introduced in various organisational systems. In another project, Navarro curated an exhibition where the exhibiting artists changed the works on display every day. His aim was to connect things that, in his opinion “should be connected”.

In a realm of similar concerns and efforts, the Art Organisation currently run five temporary exhibition spaces in Liverpool city centre. All venues are housed in derelict buildings and operated on a shoestring budget. With the encouragement by TAO’s director and curator Gregory Scott-Gurner, complete turn around of exhibitions are done pretty much over night. Furthermore, the process from proposal to exhibition can at times take less than a month since the whole idea is that the concepts as well as the actual installations are worked on by the artists themselves.

TAO has over the past six years gathered experience at the 491 Gallery which has run as a non-funded space in Leytonstone. In an effort to expand that experience and to grow with different communities, TAO came to Liverpool in 2004. There was obviously no lack of derelict buildings in the city centre at the time and they basically picked the ones that looked interesting and approached the property developers to see what that they could get their hands on. The results are the five venues now in operation.

Approaching dereliction as inspirational and the process of making these spaces habitable empowering, while at the same time trying to get access to free live and workspace, TAO is a grass roots organisation with numerous members and increasingly spreading network. Everyone who wishes is welcome to be part of this slightly anarchic constellation as it works its way through the city. It operates organically and in a completely ‘analogue’ manner which in obvious ways work to the organisation’s advantage as it creates a strong unit between likeminded people. Its temporary and nomadic nature is built on the ethos of recycling; stuff found in the skip on the street, wood from demolished houses, colleagues, friends and family contribute material and objects to the functional, friendly and sparse set up of these spaces.

Walking down the street this summer I came across the Meta-Conceptual gallery on Roscoe Street, fully graffitied and with TAO’s logo on the façade. The meta-concept stayed as a riddle with me for a while, but then I gave up on solving its meaning, at least for the time being. In further conversation with Scott-Gurner who invented the terminology, he explains that it stands for that which we some times are unable to express and possibly feel unable to name as knowledge, but still feel we possess and somehow ‘know’, perhaps as part of a consciousness not fully explored and less understood. However, the meta-concept is intensely real. Meaning beyond concept, it defies intelectualisation and instead demands action. This is the knowledge of a body that makes, and through making that becomes real.

Having developed and staged a 24 hour experience in 1999, Scott-Gurner felt the activities mostly fell within what could be called a post-conceptual movement. The current meta-conceptual activities are explored and carried forward in various ways and in various constellations.

As a brief overview of the impressive schedule taking place in the five spaces, the Projection Space on 2 Roscoe Street offers classic silent black and white films accompanied by a live musical score every Wednesday night at 8pm. 52 Roscoe Street functions as a community gallery and rehearsal space for various groups and activities. TAO’s communal living space on 102 Seel Street is open for visitors by appointment and has room for guests who wish to stay over night. 34A Slater Street hosts the International Gallery which over the past two weeks already put on two high quality exhibitions and is currently preparing for a third. 11 Wolstenholme Square, the RE-Evolutionary Gallery, hosts a group show at the moment.

It will be interesting to see what implications an initiative like this may have on future activities in the city. In many ways, it would have been great had TAO taken up abode here a bit earlier, but as there is still lots of ‘community regeneration’ to be done, this way of working may well be a functioning model or tool for a grass roots organised regeneration, for example at some of the warehouses along the river. TAO provides a valuable model for thinking about community, about regeneration and about the current role of art and artists in this context.

Cecilia Andersson runs WERK Ltd., a curatorial agency based in Liverpool and Stockholm. www.ruc.com/ werk

Further details about The Art Organisation and their Liverpool venues can be found
here
 
 
On Michelle Wren PDF Print E-mail

On Michelle Wren

by Tim Birch

“I went to Goldsmith’s but I don’t really think of myself as a Goldsmith’s graduate.” Michelle 'Mosh' Wren laughs –the first of many knowing smiles flashing across her bright, open, youthful face. Instant intrigue: not only did ‘our Mosh’ attend the trendy art school she got a First.“I only applied for it as a last choice,” says Michelle, candidly. “My tutor at school said ‘why aren’t you applying there? –Go on’. I was like ‘oh whatever’, turned up and found out it was a really good art college.”
And the First? “Yes. I think it bowled a lot of tutors over. It was really unusual.” Michelle, some might cynically say, looks like an art school dropout. It makes her achievement at Goldsmith’s all the more sweet.



“I do photography,” she says gesturing to a scale model of a theatrical proscenium arch, in cardboard, peppered with pictures. “This piece has fallen apart now –it wasn’t made very well but this is my world. This is New Cross [the location of Goldsmith’s].” She points to photos: “This is an amazing punk club… it used to be a massive, dirty big pub it’s amazing. They refurbished it all one year. I superimposed this graffiti from the Berlin Wall on there…”

A quick proviso. Mosh is a solid talker. Yet somehow she manages to get through a lot of words without shouting or breathlessness. “This was about reclaiming the space and making your world your world and how like everything was changing all around us but we all used this space for what it was.” The down-to-earth spirit and the girl-next-door quality are natural to Mosh. In art terms, she invokes the maverick spirit running throughout art history, enlivening and enriching it. It all makes for an infectious blend.

Zestful Michelle embodies the urgency among some artists to stand up and be counted –to be a signpost for yourself and your soul rather than a weather cock blown about by the whimsical ways of lifestyle choices, regeneration, globalisation, war, you name it.
“At uni, for the first two years I was unconfident –I was trying to do things to please the tutors. I was a bit of an underdog there. I’d only ever read The Daily Mirror when I went there because my mum bought it, do you know what I mean? And all of a sudden you’re on this course at Goldsmith’s and I was getting The Guardian every week and stacking them up to read like novels.”



That knowing smile breaks again. “It took me two years to realise you are what you are Michelle. And so I did that in my last year and half of the tutors were like ‘what are you doing? Michelle stop it.’ Everyone had glossy prints on nice mount board and mine were all like cut up.” Of course, rough drafts can have greater impact for their honesty. Refreshing too is Wren’s avoidance of wearing her Goldsmith’s first as a badge or stake on those elusive sirens recognition and success.

“I could have a job at the BBC now.” She laughs again. “But I don’t crave that… I didn’t really want my photo took.” She laughs further at The Guardian and The Turner Prize. It’s rare to find in a young artist, the knowledge that in terms of its solipsism, its blinkered view of popular and high culture, the right-on left can hinder things just as much as the catch-all, bad old right. “Me and my friends used to work in FACT… we had a great time… people used to walk around in suits in there, thinking they were really important.” [She drops into an impersonation of an art world snob cum knob swollen with self-importance, complete with smarmy, all-knowing, post-everything grimace].
“This is my problem with the Biennial. It’s just really not attractive to the people. All these other people come down just for the night and say, ‘oh yes, art’. But what they want to be doing is getting the people down here from the city –and actually being like ‘this is a massive festival on your city’… like Adam [Nankervis, who has quietly convened museumMan]. He was the first person who said to me you can come and do what you want here –he let us put parties on here… Everyone else puts up obstacles –you can’t fly post anymore unless you pay the Council to fly post for you.”
Back to art. Michelle picks up a tiny shrine, which she’s built into a matchbox, in homage to “a hero” -a soldier who stood guard at his posting during Pompeii. It’s an odd story of blind servitude but, also, one of naked loyalty and commitment and resolve. The ability to see the other side to a story sets Michelle apart from many young artists.

I am ultimately led to Michelle’s signature piece. “I made this for this exhibition,” she declaims, “it’s like a poem and you follow it round.” We look at the medium sized wall-based piece –again a kind of shrine. “It’s about what’s happening in Liverpool at the moment… you know I didn’t really want to contribute to the Biennial –I just think art can be really self-indulgent sometimes.” True. And a fitting cue for my own brief self-indulgence. My absolute favourite object that Michelle has influenced (arguably a more precise term for her activity than made) is a Rubik's cube -the coloured panels have been covered with sections of the Liverpool A-Z. A curious thing happens when you hold this in your hand or toy with it awhile trying to reconfigure the messed up cityscape. The simplicity, the clarity of the idea comes through the medium, the object, the handling (hers and yours). It may well remain missed by most critics and audience alike but, in my view, it's one of the best pieces across both the official and Independent Biennial.

Michelle’s art could be disparaged easily for its literal impact, its playfulness, and the reliance on the 'easy' media of photography. But her art actually operates in an intriguing way, pulling in two distinct directions: her pictures display vision as well as reportage. "Nice new apartments get built everywhere but no one can live in them… and there's this old theme park in Liverpool, it's incredible. At the end of my [visual] poem everybody goes to live in the old theme park and rebuilds the city."
The cynical might sneer: the faux revolutionary radicalism and idealism of youth etc. But there's soulful sincerity to Michelle and her work. "Basically the road where I live is getting knocked down [She flicks a hidden switch and a spotlight reveals the road itself]." She talks on as we look at the rubble, juxtaposed with images of regeneration.



She summarises: "We're the capital of culture and everything 2008 but I live on the streets where they won't get any benefit. There's all this money that the council are investing, they're saying they're investing in tourism so the people from the city can work harder to make the city a nicer place for people to come to." She rumbles on.

Art's a blast with characters like Michelle in it. Her matter-of-fact style is quite charming. And her curious, excitable mind has made its mark on my own. All too soon it’s time to go, but not before Mosh tells me of a fanzine she publishes with friends. “It's called Pigeons, Flies and Fleas sub-titled The Revolution of the Uncounted.” Count me in.

I hope one day The Guardian and the BBC and, yes, even the Turner Prize 'discover' Michelle. But if they ever do, Michelle will not need their credentials as she'll be too busy building upon her own –the ones she’s establishing right now in the Independents Biennial 2006.

‘Ode to the Capital of Culture’
museumMan
25 Parliament Street, L1
15 September – 26 November 2006
 
On Max Zadow - Abled Artist PDF Print E-mail

On Max Zadow : Abled Artist

by Tim Birch

"I haven't got an art degree and there is a certain amount of snobbery around that… I came to this through work first of all as a journalist with BBC News & Current Affairs." 

Read more...